In this blog, we delve into a legal tangle where the plaintiff’s legal team fumbled the ball, causing the court to slam the door on any further reprieve. Todd McKeague lodged a complaint against three defendants, claiming an alleged flaw in a table saw design that caused his injury. However, the plaintiff’s legal team frittered away their chance to comply with the court-approved discovery plan, missing the prescribed deadlines. They also failed to call in an expert witness, which was indispensable to the case.

In contrast, the defendants scurried to fulfill their discovery obligations within the set timelines, while the plaintiff’s legal team lagged and made tardy attempts to request an extension without filing the necessary motion. To add to their woes, the plaintiff’s legal team missed the deadline to designate any expert witnesses. The defendants saw an opportunity to pounce and filed a motion for summary judgment, citing the absence of expert testimony and the plaintiff’s non-compliance with discovery as grounds for dismissal.

The plaintiff’s legal team missed the boat again by failing to submit an opposition to the motion for summary judgment, paving the way for the court to grant the defendant’s motion and dismiss the case. The plaintiff later sought relief from the judgment, citing excusable neglect. However, the district court rejected the motion, slamming the plaintiff’s legal team for their lack of diligence and warning of possible prejudice to the defendants if a retrial was ordered.

On appeal, the district court’s decision stood. The appellate court affirmed the district court’s decision, noting that the plaintiff’s legal team had repeatedly flouted court orders and had not shown due diligence in pursuing the case. The court emphasized that the deadlines set by the court were reasonable, and the plaintiff had ample opportunity to comply. The court also commended the defendants for fulfilling all their obligations and timely filing the motion for summary judgment, which went unanswered by the plaintiff’s legal team.”

In Conclusion, “Lessons Learned: The Consequences of Failing to Comply with Court Orders and Deadlines in Pursuing Legal Claim”.

The case serves as a cautionary tale for plaintiffs and their attorneys to comply with court orders and to diligently pursue their claims within the deadlines set by the court. Failure to do so can result in significant prejudice and the loss of the opportunity to pursue one’s claims.

The Allied Outsourcing wields the power to provide unparalleled outsourced legal services, tailored to the specific needs of law firms and legal departments alike. With a team of highly skilled legal professionals and state-of-the-art technology, The Allied Outsourcing offers a comprehensive suite of legal support, spanning document analysis, contract management, legal investigation, and litigation assistance. By outsourcing these cumbersome duties to The Allied Outsourcing, clients can reap the benefits of cost savings, specialized expertise, flexible options, and heightened productivity.

Offer Services By The Allied Outsourcing 

One of the most significant perks of outsourcing legal services to Allied Outsourcing is the cost-effectiveness it offers. Clients can slash their operational costs by harnessing the proficiency of The Allied Outsourcing’s professionals, effectively bidding adieu to the need for maintaining an in-house legal team. This, in turn, allows clients to allocate their resources more efficiently and invest in other areas of their practice. Moreover, by joining forces with The Allied Outsourcing, clients gain access to a team of seasoned legal professionals, well-versed in various areas of law. This acumen empowers them to efficiently handle complex legal tasks, ensuring top-notch outcomes, and ultimately contributing to improved client satisfaction and overall success.

For further assistance, reach out to us on :

Leave a Comment